The content, sender and recipients
The open message β subject, body, From and To β recorded on screen as a video, not a still.
A screenshot of an email proves almost nothing β it can be edited in seconds and says nothing about who really sent it or whether you are even looking at genuine Gmail. Instead, record the message inside a certified browser session. The result shows the content, the sender and the recipients, the email's DKIM digital signature, and β through the signed network log β proof that it was served by Google's real Gmail servers. The whole recording is timestamped and signed, so it cannot be tampered with.
To stand up against a denial, evidence has to answer four questions a screenshot cannot.
Four independent pillars, captured live and sealed into one signed package.
The open message β subject, body, From and To β recorded on screen as a video, not a still.
Gmail's "Show details" reveals mailed-by and signed-by β the DKIM signature proving the email was really signed by the sender's domain, not spoofed.
The signed network log shows the page was served by Google's real Gmail servers over TLS β not a doctored page. How HAR files work β
The whole video is hashed, signed, and stamped with a qualified RFC 3161 timestamp β so the recording itself cannot be altered afterwards.
Optimized for Gmail β the same steps work for most webmail.
The strongest answer to "that page could be fake" is the network log β and it is signed along with the video.
mail.google.com / google.com β not a local mock-up or a phishing clone on an imposter server.No. A screenshot is a static image that can be edited in seconds β the sender, date, recipients, or body can all be changed, and it shows nothing about whether the message is genuine or which server it came from. A recorded browser session captures the live email together with its DKIM signature and a network log (HAR) proving it was served by Google's real Gmail servers, then signs and timestamps the whole recording so it cannot be altered afterwards.
When you expand the sender details in Gmail, it shows mailed-by and signed-by lines. signed-by is the DKIM digital signature: the message was cryptographically signed by the sending domain, so it genuinely originated from that sender and was not spoofed or forged. Recording this on screen captures that the email is authenticated, not just that it exists.
The HAR file is a complete log of every network request the controlled browser made during the session. It shows the page was served by Google's real Gmail servers (mail.google.com / google.com) over TLS β not a doctored local page or a phishing look-alike. Because the HAR is part of the signed, timestamped package, it independently corroborates that the email was viewed inside genuine Gmail. Learn more about HAR files β
No. When the session ends, the video and HAR are hashed, signed, and stamped with a qualified RFC 3161 timestamp. Any later change to the file breaks the hash and invalidates the signature, so the recording is tamper-evident from the moment it was certified.
Yes. The method is the same for any webmail: record the session, open the message, and expose the sender's signature/details view. Gmail is the most straightforward because "Show details" and "Show original" clearly display the DKIM signature, but the approach applies to other providers too.
No. This service creates technical evidence artifacts. Legal admissibility depends on jurisdiction and circumstances. Consult qualified legal counsel for advice specific to your situation.
Start a Browser Session, open the message in Gmail, and capture the content, the sender, the signature, and the proof it's real β in one signed recording.